Centre Defends Blocking of 4PM News YouTube Channel Before Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court has been informed by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting that blocking the YouTube channel of 4PM News was necessary on grounds of national security and public order.
In its affidavit, the government alleged that the channel published speculative and misleading content, amounting to “digital lobbying” and promoting anti-India narratives. It invoked powers under Information Technology Act, 2000, particularly Section 69A, to justify the action.
The petition, filed by editor Sanjay Sharma, challenges the blocking and seeks restoration.
The matter is scheduled for further hearing before the Court.
Madras HC Restrains Illegal Streaming of Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’
The Madras High Court has granted an interim injunction restraining unauthorised streaming of the film Jana Nayagan, starring Vijay.
Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the order in a suit filed by KVN Productions, which alleged that the film was being illegally circulated online even before certification.
The Court directed internet service providers and cable operators to block infringing websites and prevent unauthorised broadcast. It observed that continued piracy would cause irreparable loss to the producers, who hold copyright in the film.
The matter will be taken up for further hearing at a later stage.
Delhi HC Protects Sanjiv Goenka’s Personality Rights Over Morphed Content
The Delhi High Court has granted interim protection to Sanjiv Goenka against unauthorised use of his likeness through morphed images and misleading social media content.
The Court observed that while public figures may face criticism or parody, fabricated content using face morphing that creates false narratives crosses permissible limits. It noted instances where Goenka’s image was misused to depict incidents that never occurred.
Social media platforms argued safe harbour protection, stating they act as intermediaries and respond upon notice.
Balancing free speech with reputational rights, the Court granted relief and indicated it may direct disclosure of user details to identify the origin of such content.
Bombay HC Restrains Misuse of ‘NSE’ Mark by Fake Social Media Accounts
The Bombay High Court has restrained unauthorised use of the “NSE” trademark by fraudulent social media accounts impersonating the National Stock Exchange of India.
Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh passed the interim order in a suit alleging that fake accounts on platforms like X and YouTube were misleading investors with stock tips under the NSE name.
The Court noted risks of public deception, including financial loss to investors, and restrained John Doe entities from infringing and passing off the mark.
Intermediaries were directed to remove such content within 36 hours of notification by NSE, subject to evidence.
Bombay HC Tells Republic TV to Avoid ‘Embellishments’ in Ambani Coverage
The Bombay High Court has advised Republic TV and its editor Arnab Goswami to refrain from adding “embellishments” while reporting on proceedings involving Anil Ambani.
Justice Arif Doctor clarified that while reporting on legal matters is permissible, it must remain confined to facts emerging from official records and court orders.
The Court declined to impose a gag order but reiterated earlier observations cautioning against “below-the-belt” commentary.
The defamation suit, filed by Ambani alleging reputational harm, is listed for further hearing on April 29, 2026.
Delhi HC Declines Immediate Injunction in ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Dispute
The Delhi High Court has declined to grant an immediate injunction in a copyright dispute over the film Dhurandhar 2.
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, hearing a suit by Trimurti Films Private Limited against B62 Studios Private Limited and others including Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited, directed defendants to maintain detailed revenue accounts from March 19.
The plaintiff alleged infringement of rights linked to the film Tridev.
Noting no immediate urgency and no OTT release before mid-May 2026, the Court adopted a balanced approach, preserving financial records pending final adjudication.
Delhi HC Dismisses Flipkart’s ‘MarQ’ Trademark Appeal
The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by Flipkart in a trademark dispute over its “MarQ” brand, ruling in favour of Marc Enterprises.
Justice Tejas Karia upheld earlier trial court orders restraining Flipkart’s use of the mark, finding it deceptively similar to the registered “MARC” trademark held by the respondent since 1984. The Court rejected Flipkart’s argument that “MarQ” was visually and structurally distinct.
The Court permitted Flipkart to clear existing inventory within four weeks, subject to maintaining accounts, and directed compliance with the order by May 15, 2026.
Rajya Sabha Passes National Creator Economy Bill, 2026
The Rajya Sabha has passed the National Creator Economy Bill, 2026, introducing a formal legal framework for digital creators across platforms like YouTube and Instagram.
The bill recognises “Digital Content Creators” as professionals, offering benefits such as social security, standardised contracts and dispute resolution mechanisms. It also mandates registration for high-earning creators and requires disclosure of paid partnerships and AI-generated content.
A “Creator Welfare Fund,” financed through a digital advertising cess, has been proposed to provide insurance and retirement support.
While welcomed by industry stakeholders, critics have raised concerns over regulatory overreach and potential impact on creative freedom.